Claims

Mathematics achievement correlates more strongly with learners' knowledge, skills and cognitive abilities than with their personality traits, goals or emotions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3 · i3 large · n=30 meta-analyses, 66 correlations from 13,853 effect sizes (~4.66 million participants)
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-16 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Across 66 learner characteristics, the strongest correlates of mathematics achievement are knowledge and skills (verbal achievement, prior knowledge, reading, mathematics vocabulary) and cognitive abilities (intelligence, language, creativity, executive functions); personality, goals and emotions correlate less and more variably. These are correlations compiled across meta-analyses: they describe how strongly the characteristic goes with mathematics achievement, not what causes it.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Across 66 learner characteristics, the strongest correlates of mathematics achievement are knowledge and skills (verbal achievement, prior knowledge, reading, mathematics vocabulary) and cognitive abilities (intelligence, language, creativity, executive functions); personality, goals and emotions correlate less and more variably. → Breit et al. 2025

Evidence

Breit et al. 2025

Breit, M., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2025). Mathematics achievement and learner characteristics: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102621. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102621

q3 · systematic review of meta-analyses · i3 · large effect, r from .67 to −.28 across 66 variables · n=30 meta-analyses, 66 correlations from 13,853 effect sizes (~4.66 million participants) · review · r3

The review compiles zero-order correlations from published meta-analyses (each with at least ten effect sizes, the largest one kept where several covered a variable), found by a systematic PsycINFO search in July 2024. It pools nothing further and controls for nothing: many of these characteristics correlate with one another, so a correlation here says how strongly the characteristic goes with mathematics achievement, not that it causes it. Of the 66 correlations, 54 reached at least a small size (|r| ≥ .10). All eight knowledge-and-skills variables were large or very large (|r| ≥ .30): verbal achievement r = .67, prior mathematical knowledge .63, reading .52, mathematics vocabulary .49, number line estimation .44, self-regulation .42, metacognition .37, computational thinking .39. The 40 aptitude variables were mostly large: a PASS intelligence composite .62, general intelligence .49, creativity .47, fluid intelligence .41, language .42, executive-function composites .34–.40, working memory .35, spatial ability .25, and emotional intelligence the weakest at .16. The 18 personality variables ranged from −.28 to .43 (median .04): mathematics self-concept .43 and enjoyment .31 at the top, conscientiousness .22, need for cognition .25, mastery goals .17, and boredom (−.28), mathematics anxiety (−.28) and test anxiety (−.23) negative.

Discussion

Zero-order and overlapping. The authors stress that the variables are intercorrelated (intelligence overlaps with creativity, language with vocabulary and phonological processing), so the rank order describes association, not unique contribution. Malleable correlates. They note that many of the large correlates, such as self-regulation, reading, mathematics self-concept and achievement emotions, are generally considered responsive to instruction, which makes them candidate targets for support; this review itself tests no intervention. Compared with achievement in general, self-concept, creativity, prior knowledge and self-regulation correlated more strongly with mathematics than in Hattie's (2023) cross-domain synthesis.

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id math-achievement-relates-more-to-knowledge-and-abilities-than-personality
title Mathematics achievement correlates more strongly with learners' knowledge, skills and cognitive abilities than with their personality traits, goals or emotions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-16
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — breit-et-al-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.