Math anxiety explained variance in posttest monitoring judgments beyond trait anxiety, supporting its distinctness from general anxiety¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Math anxiety remained a significant negative predictor of monitoring judgments on all three posttest problems above and beyond trait anxiety. → Scheibe 2022
Evidence¶
Scheibe 2022¶
Scheibe, D. A., Fitzsimmons, C. J., Mielicki, M. K., Taber, J. M., Sidney, P. G., Coifman, K., & Thompson, C. A. (2022). Confidence in COVID problem solving: What factors predict adults’ item-level metacognitive judgments on health-related math problems before and after an educational intervention? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09300-3
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Hierarchical linear regressions on posttest monitoring judgments controlling for gender, condition, pretest judgments, and trait anxiety. Adding math anxiety improved fit on all three posttest problems (all ΔR2 = 0.01); "β’s between -0.08 and 0.10; all p’s < 0.01".
"math anxiety remained a significant predictor of monitoring judgments (β’s between -0.08 and 0.10; all p’s < 0.01) above and beyond trait anxiety"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adults who answered health math problems correctly reported higher monitoring judgments than those who answered incorrectly, with larger differences at posttest than pretest — related
- Men reported higher monitoring judgments on health math problems than women, even accounting for performance accuracy — related
- Adults randomly assigned to a worked-example educational intervention made higher post-intervention monitoring judgments on health math problems than control participants — related
- GenAI literacy dimensions predict critical monitoring beyond traits, use frequency, and perceptions, with critical-ethical awareness the strongest predictor — related
- Math self-efficacy (first four SNS items) was the only variable significantly predicting monitoring judgments on all four health math problems — related
- Math anxiety is not significantly correlated with trait anxiety in young children — related
- Math anxiety has both a direct negative effect and a WM-mediated indirect effect on children's verbal Math Reasoning, but only an indirect effect on Numerical Operations — related
- Math anxiety has a small-to-moderate negative correlation with math achievement (r = −.28) in a meta-analysis of correlations from 223 studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
math-anxiety-distinct-from-trait-anxiety-in-monitoring |
title |
Math anxiety explained variance in posttest monitoring judgments beyond trait anxiety, supporting its distinctness from general anxiety |
description |
Math anxiety explained variance in posttest monitoring judgments beyond trait anxiety, supporting its distinctness from general anxiety |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — scheibe-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.