Both SEMA subscales — numerical and situational anxiety — are equally negatively related to math achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? After controlling for FSIQ, Numerical Processing Anxiety (ρ = −0.21) and Situational and Performance Anxiety (ρ = −0.19) were each significantly negatively correlated with the WIAT-II Math Composite. → Wu SS 2012
q3 i? Both subscales correlated with Mathematical Reasoning but not with Numerical Operations. → Wu SS 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Wu SS 2012¶
Wu SS, Barth M, Amin H, Malcarne V and Menon V (2012) Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Front. Psychology 3:162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Subscale correlational analyses in the 162-child sample controlling for FSIQ, shown in Figure 3. The article reports the printed ρ and p values for both subscales against the Math Composite.
"the Numerical Processing Anxiety subscale of SEMA was significantly and negatively correlated with WIAT-II Math Composite scores ( ρ =− 0.21, p < 0.05) as was the Situational and Performance Anxiety subscale ( ρ =− 0.19, p < 0.05)."
Wu SS 2012 (2)¶
Wu SS, Barth M, Amin H, Malcarne V and Menon V (2012) Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Front. Psychology 3:162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Follow-up subscale analyses against the two WIAT-II math subtests in the same sample. The article reports the printed ρ and p values for each subscale against each subtest.
"Numerical Processing Anxiety and Situational and Performance Anxiety were correlated with Mathematical Reasoning ( ρ =− 0.27, p < 0.01; ρ =− 0.28, p < 0.01, respectively) but not Numerical Operations ( ρ =− 0.13, p = 0.15; ρ =− 0.09, p = 0.32, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Anxiety — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Affect Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Math anxiety is significantly negatively correlated with math achievement in second and third graders, independent of trait anxiety and IQ — a broader claim this one bears on
- Math anxiety is not significantly correlated with reading achievement in young children — related
- Math anxiety relates more strongly to Mathematical Reasoning than to Numerical Operations in second and third graders — related
- Math anxiety is not significantly correlated with trait anxiety in young children — related
- Math anxiety correlates strongly and negatively with mathematics achievement among third graders — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
math-anxiety-subscale-effects-on-achievement |
title |
Both SEMA subscales — numerical and situational anxiety — are equally negatively related to math achievement |
description |
Both SEMA subscales — numerical and situational anxiety — are equally negatively related to math achievement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — wu-ss-2012, wu-ss-2012-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.