Students in the mathematics and data science course rated acceptance of the AI tool higher on average than students in the biology course¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a post-activity survey, students in the Mathematics and Data Science for Decision Making course rated the Acceptance of the AI Tool dimension higher on average than students in the Fundamentals of Biological Systems course, a significant difference by t-test. → Elizondo-García ME 2025
Evidence¶
Elizondo-García ME 2025¶
Elizondo-García ME, Hernández-De la Cerda H, Benavides-García IG, Caratozzolo P and Membrillo-Hernández J (2025) Who is solving the challenge? The use of ChatGPT in mathematics and biology courses using challenge-based learning. Front. Educ. 10:1417642. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1417642
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Comparative survey analysis of two digital courses (94 biology students, 392 mathematics students) using independent t-tests at significance level 0.05 on Likert-scale items grouped into three dimensions. The Acceptance of the AI Tool dimension showed the between-course difference, with the article noting "more significant standard deviations" in the biology course.
"students in the “Mathematics and Data Science for Decision Making” course rated this dimension higher on average than those in the “Fundamentals of Biological Systems” course. This suggests that students in the mathematics course found ChatGPT more user-friendly and effective for their tasks."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students rated ChatGPT highly for completing activities more quickly, among the highest-scoring survey items in both courses — related
- Survey items on critical evaluation and validation of ChatGPT outputs (Q11–Q13) received the lowest scores in both courses despite explicit validation instructions — related
- Students in secondary mathematics report high acceptance of the domain-specific AI chatbot ADA across all Technology Acceptance Model dimensions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
math-course-higher-ai-acceptance-than-biology |
title |
Students in the mathematics and data science course rated acceptance of the AI tool higher on average than students in the biology course |
description |
Students in the mathematics and data science course rated acceptance of the AI tool higher on average than students in the biology course |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
recheck_by |
2028 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — elizondo-garcía-me-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.