Claims

Math self-efficacy trajectories differ in initial math skills and rate of math skill development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The High Stable SE and Decreasing SE trajectories had higher initial math skills than the Low Stable and Increasing trajectories (ES .56–.80), and High Stable children developed math skills faster than Decreasing (d = 0.47) and Low Stable (d = 0.66) children. → Peura 2026

Evidence

Peura 2026

Peura, P., Koponen, T., Aro, T., Viholainen, H., & Aro, M. (2026). Dynamics of change in math self-efficacy, sources of self-efficacy, and math skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 118(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0001006

q3 · i2 · associational · r2

Latent growth models of arithmetic fluency and basic arithmetic skills were linked to the four self-efficacy trajectories via BCH; the trajectories differed in level and rate of change in math skills (LR test < .01), with pairwise effect sizes ranging from .56 to .80 for initial skills.

"Children in the High Stable SE trajectory developed their math skills faster than children in the Decreasing SE (d = 0.47) and Low Stable SE (d = 0.66) trajectories."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.