Claims

Students' mathematical vocabulary use shifted from lower to higher rubric levels after the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the four-level rubric, no post-test student remained at Level 1 or 2 in math vocabulary, whereas 16 did on the pre-test. → Uyen 2021

Evidence

Uyen 2021

Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., & Tram, N. T. B. (2021). Developing mathematical communication skills for students in grade 8 in teaching congruent triangle topics. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1287-1302. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1287

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Rubric-based scoring of the 40 students' pre- and post-tests on the math vocabulary criterion (Table 5). Pre-test counts across Levels 1-4 were 4, 12, 17, 7; post-test counts were 0, 0, 29, 11, showing movement into Levels 3 and 4.

"Math vocabulary Pre-test 4 12 17 7 (Words, terms) Post-test 0 0 29 11"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id math-vocabulary-levels-improve-post-test
title Students' mathematical vocabulary use shifted from lower to higher rubric levels after the intervention
description Students' mathematical vocabulary use shifted from lower to higher rubric levels after the intervention
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — uyen-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.