Support for mathematical discourse was increased by the intervention but was not significantly associated with post-treatment mathematics achievement for either group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 The path from support for mathematical discourse to achievement was non-significant for both non-African American (b = −0.11, p = .24) and African American (b = 0.16, p = .13) students, and mediation was non-significant for both groups. → Schenke 2017
Evidence¶
Schenke 2017¶
Schenke, K., Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Sarama, J. H., & Clements, D. H. (2017). Differential effects of the classroom on African American and non-African American’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000165
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Multigroup multilevel mediation model for support for mathematical discourse in the TRIAD RCT: treatment raised ratings (0.22 points, p = .01), but the achievement paths were "not statistically significant for both groups" and bootstrap mediation tests were non-significant.
"The path from support for mathematical discourse to post-treatment mathematics achievement was not statistically significant for both groups (b = −0.11, p = .24; b = 0.16, p = .13, for non-African American and African American students, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Observed teacher expectations and developmental appropriateness were more strongly associated with mathematics achievement for African American than non-African American preschoolers — related
- Mediation of the intervention's effect via teacher expectations approached significance only for African American students — related
- Baseline correlations: teacher confidence and enthusiasm and expectations dimensions correlated with posttest achievement, but support for mathematical discourse did not — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mathematical-discourse-null-achievement-association |
title |
Support for mathematical discourse was increased by the intervention but was not significantly associated with post-treatment mathematics achievement for either group |
description |
Support for mathematical discourse was increased by the intervention but was not significantly associated with post-treatment mathematics achievement for either group |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schenke-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.