Claims

Maths anxiety predicted STEM career choice in males but not females, although the sex difference itself was not statistically significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Maths anxiety was an independent predictor in the unadjusted male model (OR = 0.62) but not the unadjusted female model (OR = 0.88); a Wald test showed the sex difference was not significant. → Ferdinand 2024

Evidence

Ferdinand 2024

Ferdinand, R., Malanchini, M. & Rimfeld, K. (2024). Mathematics interest, self-efficacy, and anxiety predict STEM career choice in emerging adulthood. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00275-1

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Sex-stratified logistic regressions in TEDS. The article reports unadjusted male OR = 0.62 [0.42, 0.89] vs female OR = 0.88 [0.67, 1.16]; the Wald test (X2 = 2.26, p = 0.13) indicates the difference between sexes was not significant.

"A Wald Chi-square test showed that maths anxiety was not a signi ficantly better pre- dictor of STEM career choice in the male sample than in the female sample (X2 = 2.26, p = 0.13)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.