Mayer published seven pieces in Educational Psychology Review, including the Select–Organize–Integrate model of learning and a research-based analysis of animation as an aid to multimedia learning.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Mayer and colleagues published seven pieces in Educational Psychology Review, ranging from an introduction to the Select–Organize–Integrate model (1996) to a research-based analysis of how animation can support learning (2002) to advice to new researchers (2008). → Mayer 2009

Evidence¶

Mayer 2009¶

Mayer, R. E. (2009). The Past and Future of Educational Psychology Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9102-2

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The commentary's author recounts his own publication record in the journal, citing the SOI model introduction (1996), the animation analysis with Moreno (2002), and advice to new researchers (2008). This is a self-report, not a tested result.

"my colleagues and I have published seven pieces in Educational Psychology Review ranging from an introduction to a theory of learning that I called the Select –Organize–Integrate model"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Segmenting complex dynamic visualizations into pieces with pauses improves learning outcomes, especially transfer performance, at least for novices, compared with non-segmented presentations — related
• Clear Structure Improves Learning — related
• All four original multimedia experiments showed a main effect favoring the dynamic visualization, especially for transfer tasks — related
• Segmenting principle: learner-paced segments of narrated animation improve transfer over continuous presentation — related
• Signaling Improves Learning — related
• Multimedia Principle Improves Learning — related
• Segmenting Improves Multimedia Learning — related
• On-screen text that duplicates the narration of a diagram can hurt learning, but spoken–written redundancy is not harmful on average and helps over spoken-only presentation in some conditions — related