By macro cycle two, faculty reported no changes were needed to five of the six overarching standards, indicating acceptance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In macro cycle two, the majority of participants noted no changes were needed to five of the six overarching standards, which the authors interpret as acceptance of the conjectured theory of ontological innovation. → Helen Crompton 2026
Evidence¶
Helen Crompton 2026¶
Helen Crompton, Diane Burke and Christine Nickel. (2026). Designing faculty standards for technology integration in higher education institutions: a design-based research study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00584-y
q2 · i? · design · r3
Macro cycle two retrospective analysis of grounded-coded survey and interview data from 58 faculty plus other participant groups. Feedback focused at a more granular level on indicators, with small changes to clarity, additions, deletions, and specificity.
"In this cycle, the data show that Faculty reported no changes were needed to five of the six overarching standards. The requests for changes to the indicators were few. The majority of participants noted that no changes were needed revealing acceptance of the conjectured theory of ontological innovation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Design-based research with 114 participants across two macro cycles produced and refined the faculty technology standards — a broader claim this one bears on
- Participant feedback in macro cycle one prompted renaming the Administrator standard to Coordinator and reordering the standards — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mc2-acceptance-five-of-six-standards |
title |
By macro cycle two, faculty reported no changes were needed to five of the six overarching standards, indicating acceptance |
description |
By macro cycle two, faculty reported no changes were needed to five of the six overarching standards, indicating acceptance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — helen-crompton-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.