Claims

Multiple Classification Analysis shows both treatment groups with large positive adjusted deviations and the control group far below average

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Adjusted deviations for post-test scores were 10.26 for Enrichment Triad, 10.09 for Self-Directed, and -28.54 for Control, with Multiple R = 0.979 and R Square = 0.978. → Fakolade 2010

Evidence

Fakolade 2010

Fakolade, O. A. & Adeniyi, S. A. (2010). Efficacy of Enrichment Triad and Self-Direct Models on Academic Achievement of Gifted Students in Selected Secondary Schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Special Education, Vol 25 No 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ890561

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Multiple Classification Analysis of post-test scores by treatment and gender (Table 2), used to determine the magnitude of group performance. Adjusted deviations: Enrichment Triad 10.26 (n=28), Self-Directed 10.09 (n=27), Control -28.54 (n=20); "MULTIPLE R = 0.979 R SQUARE = 0.978". These are descriptive deviations, not standardized effect sizes.

"MULTIPLE R = 0.979 R SQUARE = 0.978"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.