Claims

With accommodations such as additional examination time, medical students with SpLDs show no statistically significant difference in MCQ performance (d = 0.045)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Random-effects meta-analysis of three studies shows no statistically significant difference in MCQ-based assessment performance between students with and without SpLDs when accommodations (typically extra time) were provided (d = 0.045, 95% CI: −0.094 to 0.183). → Pavletič Bernarda 2026

Evidence

Pavletič Bernarda 2026

Pavletič Bernarda, Babuder Milena Košak, Homar Vesna. (2026). Medical students with specific learning disabilities: mixed-methods systematic review of the prevalence, academic performance, challenges, and perceived impact of support interventions. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09574-0

q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of three studies (McKendree, Ricketts, Meeks) of MCQ-type assessments with additional examination time as accommodation; pooled d = 0.045, τ² = 0.022. The review rates certainty low-moderate using GRADE and stresses results "should be interpreted with caution".

"Using a random-effects model, the pooled standardized mean difference was d = 0.045 (95% CI: −0.094 to 0.183), indicating no statistically significant difference in MCQ performance between students with and without SpLDs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.