mCSCL produces a medium overall effect on learning performance (Hedges's g = 0.516)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Across 48 studies with 5,294 participants, mCSCL yielded a medium overall mean effect size of Hedges's g = 0.516 on learning performance. → Sung Yao-Ting 2017

Evidence¶

Sung Yao-Ting 2017¶

Sung Yao-Ting, Yang Je-Ming, Lee Han-Yueh. (2017). The Effects of Mobile-Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Meta-Analysis and Critical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704307

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Random-effects meta-analysis integrating 163 effect sizes from 48 articles (5,294 participants) published 2000–2015. The article reports the printed effect size Hedges's g = 0.516, stating "the overall mean ES of the 48 articles was a medium one of 0.516" with 95% CI [0.377, 0.655], and notes 69.71% of mCSCL learners performed better than comparison learners.

"the overall mean ES of the 48 articles was a medium one of 0.516, with a 95% confidence interval [0.377, 0.655]"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• mCSCL benefits learning achievement, learning attitude, and peer interaction, with the largest effect on achievement — related
• mCSCL effects do not differ significantly by group size, though tetrads show the largest subgroup effect and dyads alone are not significant — related
• mCSCL outperforms individual learning and non-mobile collaborative learning, but shows no significant advantage over desktop CSCL — related
• Structured and ill-structured mCSCL teaching methods show similar effects; competitive methods (TGT, STAD) were not significant — related
• Individual rewards yield significant mCSCL effects while group reward methods do not — related