Meaningful background speech impairs delayed memory for texts in teenagers more consistently than transportation noise¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Recall of prose paragraphs read under noise and tested later in silence was impaired by meaningful speech but not by meaningless speech. → Klatte M 2013
q2 i? Results for transportation noise are inconsistent across studies, with some finding impairments from aircraft or road traffic noise and others finding none. → Klatte M 2013 (2)
Evidence¶
Klatte M 2013¶
Klatte M, Bergström K and Lachmann T (2013) Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front. Psychol. 4:578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports teenage prose-memory studies: "Recall performance was impaired by meaningful speech... but not by meaningless speech", consistent with adult studies showing meaningful speech is more disruptive in verbal tasks.
"Recall performance was impaired by meaningful speech (Hygge et al., 2003; Boman, 2004; Sörqvist, 2010 ), but not by meaningless speech ( Hygge, 2003 )."
Klatte M 2013 (2)¶
Klatte M, Bergström K and Lachmann T (2013) Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front. Psychol. 4:578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports inconsistent transportation-noise findings across studies; Ljung et al. (2009) found no effect of road traffic noise or meaningful speech on 12- to 13-year-olds' online reading comprehension.
"Hygge (2003) found impairments due to aircraft noise during encoding. Sörqvist (2010) used a within-subjects design and found no effect of aircraft noise, but severe impairments due to meaningful speech."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Auditory Processing — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Irrelevant changing-state sounds impair children's serial recall of visually presented items, with developmental evidence pointing to two mechanisms — related
- Noise impairs children's performance in complex listening tasks beyond simple identification, with children affected more than adults — related
- Chronic aircraft noise exposure is associated with lower reading comprehension in children, with a linear exposure–effect relationship — related
- In the RANCH study, increasing road traffic noise exposure was associated with enhanced episodic memory, an unexplained counter-intuitive finding — related
- Children are more susceptible than adults to the effects of environmental noise on cognitive performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
meaningful-speech-impairs-prose-memory-teenagers |
title |
Meaningful background speech impairs delayed memory for texts in teenagers more consistently than transportation noise |
description |
Meaningful background speech impairs delayed memory for texts in teenagers more consistently than transportation noise |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — klatte-m-2013, klatte-m-2013-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.