Among concept mastery aspects, memorizing scored highest and applying scored lowest after the video treatment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors report that the applying aspect achieved the lowest score after memorizing and understanding, and that memorizing was the highest-scoring aspect. → Wilujeng 2020
Evidence¶
Wilujeng 2020¶
Wilujeng, I., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Ertika, & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2020). Local Potential Integrated Science Video to Improve SPS and Concept Mastery. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13413a
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' interpretation of the per-aspect post-test results shown in Figure 4, describing the pattern across the three assessed cognitive aspects rather than reporting a statistical test between aspects.
"The last aspect of concept mastery considered in this study is applying. The findings show that this aspect achieves the lowest score after memorizing and understanding."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A science learning video integrated with a local MHP plant improves junior high students' concept mastery more than PowerPoint images-narration — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.