Claims

Memory recall declines over the 12-hour retention interval between encoding and retrieval

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Paired-associate recall was poorer at session 2 than session 1, a large within-subject decline (d = 1.36). → Pontifex 2016

Evidence

Pontifex 2016

Pontifex, M. B., Gwizdala, K. L., Parks, A. C., Pfeiffer, K. A. & Fenn, K. M. (2016). The Association between Physical Activity During the Day and Long-Term Memory Stability. Scientific Reports 6, 38148. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38148

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Within-sample paired t-test across the 92 participants comparing cued recall at the two sessions. Recall "decrease[d] over time", from 49.4 ± 6.8 to 47.0 ± 7.8 words, t(91) = 7.2, p < 0.001, d = 1.36.

"Memory recall was observed to decrease over time, with poorer performance observed at session 2 (47.0 ± 7.8 words) relative to session 1 (49.4 ± 6.8 words; t (91) = 7.2, p < 0.001, d = 1.36)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id memory-declines-over-12-hour-interval
title Memory recall declines over the 12-hour retention interval between encoding and retrieval
description Memory recall declines over the 12-hour retention interval between encoding and retrieval
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pontifex-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.