Claims

Mentor-guided SRL approaches positively affected residents' practice, including progressive independence in goal setting and improved practice habits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two studies showed a mentor-guided SRL approach affected residents' practice positively: residents demonstrated progressive independence in setting learning goals, and all residents displayed improvement in all practised tasks. → van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

Evidence

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A, Berkhout Joris J, van Dijk Nynke, Endedijk Maaike D, Jaarsma A Debbie, Diemers Agnes D. (2018). Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review reports the study by Aho et al. examining whether a mentor-guided SRL approach improved practice habits among surgery residents; "all residents displayed improvement in all practised tasks" and reported higher practising frequency. In George et al., residents showed progressive independence in goal setting.

"Results showed that all residents displayed improvement in all practised tasks. Residents also reported that the frequency of practising was higher in this mentor‐guided SRL rotation."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.