Barriers to mentoring as a KT intervention included staff resistance and shortage, lack of time, lack of knowledge and skills, and inadequate guidance from mentors; enablers included leadership support, staff involvement, and available mentors¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of 10 studies, four reported barriers to mentoring (staff resistance and shortage, staff lack of time, lack of knowledge and skills related to guideline recommendations, and inadequate guidance from mentors). → Abdullah 2014
q2 i? Four studies reported enablers to mentoring: leadership support, staff involvement, and available mentors. → Abdullah 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Abdullah 2014¶
Abdullah, G., Rossy, D., Ploeg, J., Davies, B., Higuchi, K., Sikora, L., & Stacey, D. (2014). Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(5), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060
q2 · i? · review · r3
Descriptive synthesis of the review: of 10 studies, four reported barriers to mentoring; the review lists "staff resistance and shortage, staff lack of time, lack of knowledge and skills related to guideline recommendations, and inadequate guidance from mentors".
"The barriers identified were staff resistance and shortage, staff lack of time, lack of knowledge and skills related to guideline recommendations, and inadequate guidance from mentors."
Abdullah 2014 (2)¶
Abdullah, G., Rossy, D., Ploeg, J., Davies, B., Higuchi, K., Sikora, L., & Stacey, D. (2014). Measuring the Effectiveness of Mentoring as a Knowledge Translation Intervention for Implementing Empirical Evidence: A Systematic Review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(5), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12060
q2 · i? · review · r3
Descriptive synthesis of the review: of 10 studies, four reported enablers to mentoring; the review identifies "leadership support, staff involvement, and available mentors" as the enablers.
"The enablers identified were leadership support, staff involvement, and available mentors."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mentoring alone as a knowledge translation intervention was evaluated in only one included study, which showed improvement in some behavioral outcomes — related
- Interviewees identified leadership prioritization, staff buy-in, and investments in staffing, training, partnerships, and funding as facilitators of trauma-engaged implementation — related
- Four implementation themes emerged from UK process evaluations: intervention format, policy consistency, staff buy-in, and perceived effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.