Claims

Mentoring residents improves mentors' own teaching practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 94% of NCTR mentors participating in 2014-15 reported that mentoring residents made them a more effective teacher. → Guha 2016

Evidence

Guha 2016

Guha, R., Hyler, M.E., and Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). The Teacher Residency: An Innovative Model for Preparing Teachers. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-residency

q2 · i? · review · r2

The report cites survey data from NCTR network mentors in 2014-15, in which the large majority "reported that mentoring residents made them a more effective teacher". A study of eight urban residency mentors also found mentors saw their role as part of urban reform and viewed a year-long placement as necessary for developing student-centered practice.

"94% of NCTR mentors participating in 2014–15 reported that mentoring residents made them a more effective teacher"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mentoring-residents-improves-mentor-practice
title Mentoring residents improves mentors' own teaching practice
description Mentoring residents improves mentors' own teaching practice
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — guha-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.