Claims

A meta-analysis of literature and policy sources yields climate resilience education ideas groupable into content, methods, goals and actions aligned with learning objectives

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Sorting and classification of selected literature produced four interpretation categories: content, purpose, method, and action. → Utomo 2021

Evidence

Utomo 2021

Utomo, H. D.; Aliman, M. (2021). The meta-analysis of climate resilience education in higher education for transformation based on experiential learning models. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(2), 302-316. https://doi.org/10.33403rigeo.754200

q2 · i? · review · r2

The article's own meta-analysis (overlay of books, journals and news, filtered against standards of learning outcomes) classified selected literature into content, purpose, method and action categories, reported in Table 2. This is a narrative synthesis, not a statistical pooling of effect sizes.

"As a result of sorting and classification, the classification is divided based on the content, method, objectives, and actions interpreted."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.