Metacognition interventions enhance children's self-efficacy only at follow-up, suggesting effects unfold over a protracted period¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q4
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q4 i? Self-efficacy benefits from metacognition interventions emerged at follow-up but not at immediate post-test. → Janina Eberhart 2024

Evidence¶

Janina Eberhart 2024¶

Janina Eberhart, Franziska Ingendahl, Donna Bryce. (2024). Are metacognition interventions in young children effective? Evidence from a series of meta-analyses. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09405-x

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Outcome-specific meta-analysis within the 67-study dataset, with self-efficacy coded separately from other motivational constructs. The article reports enhancement "only at follow-up"; no effect size for this specific outcome is printed in the available text.

"Interestingly, metacognition interventions effectively enhanced children's self-efficacy only at follow-up, suggesting that the positive impact of these interventions can unfold over a protracted period."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Metacognition intervention effects persist at follow-up (g = 0.29) in young children — related
• Metacognition interventions enhance cognitive and academic outcomes in typically developing children up to age 12 at immediate post-test (g = 0.48) — related