Students' use of metacognitive actions to direct group work increased over time when using the Knowledge Catalyser tools¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Use of planning, clarifying, and monitoring actions to help direct the work of the group and its members increased over time, indicating increased employment of metacognitive skills. → Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse 2010

Evidence¶

Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse 2010¶

Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse. (2010). A prism of CSCL research. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9087-3

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The editorial reports, citing Pifarre and Cobos, an observational study of the Knowledge Catalyser forum in a normal course, analyzing student postings coded as metacognitive actions (planning, clarifying, monitoring). The reported increase is over time with no statistics printed.

"The use by students of these actions to help direct the work of the group and its members increased over time, indicating an increase in the employment of metacognitive skills using the tools designed into the collaboration technology."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Metacognitive prompts improve learning — a broader claim this one bears on
• GenAI use collapses SRL cycle transitions, with metacognitive activity restructuring around the tool — related
• KBDeX visualization and knowledge building rubrics engaged PSTs in continuous monitoring, analysis, negotiation, synthesis, and identification of promising inquiry routes — related
• Without instructional support, learners show low cognitive strategy use and almost absent metacognitive strategies in journal writing, and realized strategy use correlates with learning outcomes — related