Claims

The largest reported effects came from interventions training reflection on own learning and teaching through metacognitive judgements (Michalsky 2021: d = 3.12; Pieschl et al. 2021: d = 2.9)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Michalsky's (2021) intervention achieved the highest effect size (d = 3.12) in metacognitive knowledge, and Pieschl et al. (2021) obtained d = 2.9 in academic performance. → Alazne Fernández Ortube 2024

Evidence

Alazne Fernández Ortube 2024

Alazne Fernández Ortube, Ernesto Panadero, Charlotte Dignath. (2024). Self-Regulated Learning Interventions for Pre-service Teachers: a Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09919-5

q2 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Within the review's RQ4 analysis of the 53 quantitative studies, the two largest printed effect sizes are reported: "d = 3.12" for metacognitive knowledge and "d = 2.9" for academic performance, both from interventions training reflection through metacognitive judgements.

"Michalsky’s (2021) intervention achieved the highest effect size (d = 3.12) in metacognitive knowledge, and Pieschl et al. (2021) obtained a high effect size in academic performance (d = 2.9). Both interventions trained pre-service teachers to reflect on their own learning (Pieschl et al. (2012)) and teaching (Michalsky (2021)) practice through metacognitive judgements."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id metacognitive-judgement-reflection-interventions-largest-effects
title The largest reported effects came from interventions training reflection on own learning and teaching through metacognitive judgements (Michalsky 2021: d = 3.12; Pieschl et al. 2021: d = 2.9)
description The largest reported effects came from interventions training reflection on own learning and teaching through metacognitive judgements (Michalsky 2021: d = 3.12; Pieschl et al.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — alazne-fernández-ortube-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.