Retrieval practice mainly improves metamemory whereas generative activities mainly improve metacomprehension¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-22 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Tasks mainly eliciting retrieval practice primarily influence metamemory (monitoring of retrievability), while tasks mainly eliciting generative activities mainly influence metacomprehension (monitoring of comprehension quality). → Julian Roelle 2023
Evidence¶
Julian Roelle 2023¶
Julian Roelle, Tino Endres, Roman Abel, Niklas Obergassel, Matthias Nückles, Alexander Renkl. (2023). Happy Together? On the Relationship Between Research on Retrieval Practice and Generative Learning Using the Case of Follow-Up Learning Tasks. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09810-9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's synthesis of indirect metacognitive effects states that "generative learning activities mainly influence metacomprehension, whereas retrieval practice primarily influences metamemory," attributing the difference to which implicit cues become salient during each activity type. Both activity types can foster monitoring accuracy.
"However, generative learning activities mainly influence metacomprehension, whereas retrieval practice primarily influences metamemory."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Generative and visualizing tasks improve metacomprehension and monitoring accuracy but show small or null effects on learning outcomes — related
- Generative activities improve students' monitoring accuracy but not their actual learning after restudy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
metamemory-versus-metacomprehension-indirect-effects |
title |
Retrieval practice mainly improves metamemory whereas generative activities mainly improve metacomprehension |
description |
Retrieval practice mainly improves metamemory whereas generative activities mainly improve metacomprehension |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
source_checked |
2026-10-22 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — julian-roelle-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.