The choice of magnitude comparison measure type carries methodological implications for studies of children's mathematical development¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The study's findings raise methodological implications regarding the role of different types of magnitude comparison measures. → Xenidou-Dervou 2017

Evidence¶

Xenidou-Dervou 2017¶

Xenidou-Dervou, I., Molenaar, D., Ansari, D., van der Schoot, M., & van Lieshout, E.C.D.M. (2017). Nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude comparison skills as longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement. Learning and Instruction, 50, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.001

q3 · i? · associational · r2

The authors' stated implication from the longitudinal findings: "the present results raise several methodological implications regarding the role of different types of magnitude comparison measures." The available text does not elaborate the specific implications.

"Furthermore, the present results raise several methodological implications regarding the role of different types of magnitude comparison measures."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Symbolic numerical magnitude comparison has a more unique association than number line estimation with children's speed on indirect-addition subtraction items — related