Claims

Math fact retrieval (MFR) fluency training before Wayang tutoring improved math learning (Wayang vs. no-Wayang d = 0.39), with the Wayang-MFR combination scoring highest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In a randomized four-condition study of 250 middle school students, the Wayang-MFR group did better than the Wayang-noMFR group at posttest, and the effect size for Wayang vs. no-Wayang was Cohen's d = 0.39. → Arroyo 2014 q3 i? Students who received MFR training became faster at responding to easy arithmetic items than students who did not. → Arroyo 2014 (2)

Evidence

Arroyo 2014

Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses Cognition, Metacognition and Affect. Int J Artif Intell Educ 24:387–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Time-controlled study of 250 middle school students randomly assigned to four conditions: Wayang alone, Wayang after 15 minutes of MFR training, MFR plus non-tutoring websites, or classroom instruction. The article reports "the Wayang-MFR group did better than the Wayang-noMFR group" with d = 0.39 for Wayang vs. no-Wayang.

"There were significant effects for Wayang and the combination of Wayang and MFR training, indicating that the Wayang-MFR group did better than the Wayang-noMFR group. The effect size for Wayang vs. no-Wayang groups (Cohen’s d) was 0.39"

Arroyo 2014 (2)

Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A Multimedia Adaptive Tutoring System for Mathematics that Addresses Cognition, Metacognition and Affect. Int J Artif Intell Educ 24:387–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Speed outcome of the same 250-student study, plotted in Fig. 8 as milliseconds to respond to basic arithmetic problems; MFR-trained students responded faster than non-MFR students. No effect size is printed for this measure.

"As expected, students with MFR training became faster at responding to easy arithmetic items, see Fig. 8."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mfr-fluency-training-improves-learning
title Math fact retrieval (MFR) fluency training before Wayang tutoring improved math learning (Wayang vs. no-Wayang d = 0.39), with the Wayang-MFR combination scoring highest
description Math fact retrieval (MFR) fluency training before Wayang tutoring improved math learning (Wayang vs.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — arroyo-2014, arroyo-2014-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.