Claims

The experimental group's descriptive pre- and post-test means were higher than the control group's, but the unadjusted difference was not tested

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive statistics showed the experimental group (post-test M = 24.60) scored higher than the control group (post-test M = 17.55), but the authors note the unadjusted difference was not tested for significance. → Ali abdi 2013

Evidence

Ali abdi 2013

Ali abdi, Soosan Laei, Hamze Ahmadyan. (2013). The Effect of Teaching Strategy Based on Multiple Intelligences on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 1(4): 281-284. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010401

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive reporting of Table 1 means, standard deviations and standard error means for both groups on pre-test and post-test (experimental post-test M = 24.60, control M = 17.55). The article states one cannot say from these values whether the difference is significant.

"Table 1 indicates that experimental group performed better than the control group as shown by the values of means and standard deviations but one cannot say whether these differences observed is significant or not."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.