Effect sizes of multiple intelligence practices are highly heterogeneous across studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The homogeneity test showed heterogeneous distribution of success data (Q=518,665, p<0,001; I2 above 75%). → Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015

Evidence¶

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat 2015¶

Eyüp Yurt & Seyat Polat. (2015). The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence Applications on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 6(1), 84-122. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105368

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Homogeneity test across the 81 comparisons in the meta-analysis. The article reports the Q statistic and states that I2 values bigger than 75% show the distribution of effect values is "highly heterogeneous".

"On the other hand, Q value which was calculated with homogeneity test showed that distributions of the success data have a heterogeneous structure (Q=518,6 65, p<0,001)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Effect sizes across primary studies are highly heterogeneous (Q = 283.659, I² = 77%), justifying the random-effects model — related
• Effect sizes across the included studies are highly heterogeneous (I² = 91.37%), indicating moderating factors — related
• Individual studies of digital story effects are highly heterogeneous, requiring a random effects model — related
• Effect size distributions across AR-in-education studies were heterogeneous (Q=35.692, I²=60.776%), requiring a random effects model — related