The middle prior-knowledge group benefited most from Supplemental Practice, significantly outperforming the middle control group on current points, test 3, final, quizzes, and course GPA¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The middle experimental group significantly outperformed the middle control group on current points (p = 0.016), test 3 (p = 0.021), final (p = 0.019), quizzes (p = 0.020), and course GPA (p = 0.050). → David Miller and Matthew Schraeder 2015

Evidence¶

David Miller and Matthew Schraeder 2015¶

David Miller and Matthew Schraeder. (2015). Research on Group Learning and Cognitive Science: A Study of Motivation, Knowledge, and Self-Regulation in a Large Lecture College Algebra Class. The Mathematics Educator, Vol. 24, No. 2, 27-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085089

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Prior-knowledge subgroup analysis of the randomized experiment: middle prior knowledge defined as ACT scores 26-30, middle control (n=59) vs middle experimental (n=89). Table 6 reports p-values including current points 0.016, test 3 0.021, final 0.019, quizzes 0.020, course GPA 0.050. "The middle experimental outperformed significantly the middle control on current points, test 3, final, quizzes, and course GPA."

"The middle experimental outperformed significantly the middle control on current points, test 3, final, quizzes, and course GPA."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students using worked-example worksheets in weekly Supplemental Practice sessions significantly outperformed control students on test 3 and the final exam in a large College Algebra course — related
• Facebook-supplemented instruction benefited medium-skilled (50-80%) students most, while the highest-ability students improved less than traditionally taught peers — related