Claims

VIII standard students taught English grammar with mind mapping showed significantly higher gain scores than control-group students taught by the conventional method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Gain scores for knowledge, understanding and application were significantly higher in the experimental (mind map) group than the control group. → D. Hallen 2015

Evidence

D. Hallen 2015

D. Hallen, N. Sangeetha. (2015). Effectiveness of Mind Mapping in English Teaching Among VIII Standard Students. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 5, No. 1, January-March. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068370

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Two equivalent-group pretest-posttest experiment with 30 students per group; Table 1 reports calculated 't' values of 1.990 (knowledge), 3.048 (understanding) and 2.646 (application), all "Significant" at the 5% level against a table value of 1.96 for df = 58.

"Here, the calculated 't' values are greater than the table value. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is a significant difference between control and experimental group students in their gain scores"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.