Claims

Pupils in both interventions achieved higher growth mindset scores than controls, but with low security

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pupils involved in both interventions achieved higher scores on measures of theories of intelligence than control pupils, but the report judges the security of these findings low and possibly due to chance. → Rienzo et al. 2015

Evidence

Rienzo et al. 2015

Cinzia Rienzo, Heather Rolfe and David Wilkinson (NIESR). (2015). Changing Mindsets: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581132

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Both trials measured pupils' theories of intelligence using three entity theory statements written by Dweck (1999), rated on a 6-point Likert scale. The report states pupils in both interventions "achieved higher scores on these measures than those in the control group" with low security.

"Pupils involved in both interventions achieved higher scores on these measures than those in the control group, but the security of these findings is low and it is possible that they occurred by chance."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.