Claims

Providing books and a single workshop without ongoing coaching did not improve prekindergarten classroom quality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The Comparison condition (10 books per classroom and one workshop on self-care) did not improve the quality of teachers' interactions with children to the degree the UBC program did. → Leyva 2014

Evidence

Leyva 2014

Leyva, D., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C. E., Treviño, E., Rolla, A., Barata, M. C., & Weiland, C. (2014). Can we improve preschool classroom quality in Chile? A cluster-randomized trial evaluation of a professional development program. SREE Spring 2014 Conference abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562728

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the cluster-randomized trial, Comparison schools received "10 books distributed per classroom and one workshop on self-care issues for teachers and aides". The article reports Comparison teachers and aides "did not improve the quality of their interactions with children during the pre-kindergarten year to the degree that teachers and aides in the UBC program did".

"They also suggest that simply providing some books to teachers and aides and offering a workshop (the Comparison-condition intervention) is not sufficient to make a positive and significant impact on pre-kindergarten classroom quality in Chile."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.