Mirroring-condition teachers consulted the dashboard more often than guiding-condition teachers (137 vs 95 consultations) but missed aspects needing reaction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Screen-captured tablet data showed teachers consulted the dashboard more often in the mirroring condition (137 times) than in the guiding condition (95 times), and reported concentrating on one collaboration aspect and missing elements to react to. → Ishari Amarasinghe; Davinia Hernández-Leo; H. Ulrich Hoppe 2021

Evidence¶

Ishari Amarasinghe; Davinia Hernández-Leo; H. Ulrich Hoppe 2021¶

Ishari Amarasinghe; Davinia Hernández-Leo; H. Ulrich Hoppe (2021). Deconstructing orchestration load: comparing teacher support through mirroring and guiding. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09351-9

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Log/screen-capture analysis during mirroring sessions. The Responses Related tab was selected 80 times and the Participation Related tab 57 times. Teachers' questionnaire responses noted: "I missed elements to which I could have reacted, like adding more time in some phases".

"the screen-captured data from the dashboard tablet showed that teachers consulted the information presented in the dashboard more often in the mirroring condition (137 times) when compared to the guiding condition (95 times)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Guiding support stimulated targeted interactions: teachers posted more messages to groups (14 vs 4) and performed more dashboard interventions than under mirroring — related
• A mirroring dashboard shifts teacher attention toward epistemic over social aspects of learning, while a guiding dashboard divides interventions more equally — related
• Teacher-facing dashboards that mirror or guide increase teacher awareness and targeted interventions during classroom orchestration — a broader claim this one bears on
• Reported cognitive load was lowest in the mirroring condition (5.4), compared with no dashboard (5.6) and guiding (6.2) — related