Mirroring-condition teachers relied more on indicator views while alerting and advising teachers opened more group overviews¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Conditions differed significantly in number of indicator views (F(2,50) = 5.03, η2 = 0.167), with a specific mirroring-versus-alerting difference (d = 0.52). → van Leeuwen 2019
Evidence¶
van Leeuwen 2019¶
van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., & van Gog, T. (2019). What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 14, 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09299-x
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Exploratory analysis of dashboard interaction in the between-subjects experiment (n = 53). A significant condition difference in indicator views, η2 = 0.167, and a mirroring-versus-alerting post hoc difference, d = 0.52; mirroring teachers looked at "the highest number of indicators, with an average of 5.70 indicators per vignette" and seemed to rely more on indicators than group overviews.
"Analysis showed there was a significant difference between conditions, F(2,50) = 5.03, p =. 0 1 ,η2 = 0.167. Bonferroni post hoc tests showed a specific difference between the mirroring ( M = 2.96, SD = 1.68) and alerting ( M =3 . 7 7 ,SD = 1.44) condition, p =. 0 1 ,d =0 . 5 2 ."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mirroring dashboards improved teacher situational awareness while alerting-and-guiding dashboards reduced teacher workload and frustration — related
- Dashboard support type did not influence detection of CSCL events but did influence teachers' interpretation of the situation — related
- Teacher interviews identified five types of monitored information and, via the Kano method, four highest-priority dashboard indicators for CSCL monitoring — related
- Guiding dashboard support enabled teachers to perform more orchestration actions, more targeted interactions, and more class announcements than mirroring support — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mirroring-teachers-rely-on-indicators-not-group-overviews |
title |
Mirroring-condition teachers relied more on indicator views while alerting and advising teachers opened more group overviews |
description |
Mirroring-condition teachers relied more on indicator views while alerting and advising teachers opened more group overviews |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — van-leeuwen-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.