Misalignment profiles predict growth-oriented disengagement: students can endorse self-change while withdrawing when routes are perceived as infeasible¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr3·q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? High self-change paired with low environment-change and/or low pathway flexibility produces motivational dynamics difficult to detect when only self-beliefs are measured. → Srinivasan 2026
q1 i? When pathway flexibility is low, disengagement tends to occur earlier and more decisively, not because students doubt their capacity to grow, but because no legitimate route forward is perceived. → Srinivasan 2026
Evidence¶
Srinivasan 2026¶
Srinivasan, H. (2026). Possibility Mindset: A Theory of Motivation Under Constraint, with Neurodivergence as a Revealing Interpretive Case. Preprint (v1) posted to PsyArXiv on January 18, 2026. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv
q1 · i? · theoretical · r3
Theoretical prediction from the conceptual model section, illustrated in Figure 1 as interaction rather than additive contribution. The article states the profiles in Table 2 generate falsifiable predictions about withdrawal timing, help-seeking patterns, strategy switching, and explanations for difficulty; no data are reported.
"misalignment among the three belief dimensions is predicted to be a primary driver of what might be termed growth-oriented disengagement, wherein students endorse self-change while withdrawing due to perceived infeasibility of available routes."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Academic emotions—enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom—mediate the association between perceived AI-adaptive environments and SRL, accounting for 54.8% of the total effect — related
- Growth-mindset interventions have weak average effects on achievement, including a negligible GPA gain (d = 0.11) for lower-achieving US ninth-graders in one preregistered national trial — related
- Interviews identify IEI implementation gaps — curriculum-industry misalignment, limited project diversity, and weak enterprise engagement — as boundary conditions on the psychological pathways — related
- SR–OB profile patterns differ by prior AI literacy experience: overestimation appears only among experienced teachers and a low–low profile only among inexperienced teachers — related
- Higher mathematics test anxiety predicts earlier practice-session exit, mediating lower learning gains in an adaptive math program — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
misalignment-profiles-predict-growth-oriented-disengagement |
title |
Misalignment profiles predict growth-oriented disengagement: students can endorse self-change while withdrawing when routes are perceived as infeasible |
description |
Misalignment profiles predict growth-oriented disengagement: students can endorse self-change while withdrawing when routes are perceived as infeasible |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — srinivasan-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.