MITCA prevented the growth of self-regulatory deficits seen under traditional homework over twelve weeks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 At post-test the experimental group reported significantly lower self-regulatory deficit than the control group (d = 0.17). → Tania Vieites 2024
q3 i? Control-group self-regulatory deficits increased significantly from pre-test to post-test, while MITCA-group deficits remained at the same level. → Tania Vieites 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Tania Vieites 2024¶
Tania Vieites, Eleftheria Gonida, Fátima Díaz-Freire, Susana Rodríguez, Antonio Valle. (2024). Effects of a homework implementation method (MITCA) on self-regulation of learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09376-z
q3 · i0 · causal · r1
Post-test between-group t-tests in the MITCA intervention with 533 fifth and sixth graders. The article reports "self-regulatory deficit (t = -2.557, p < 0.05, d = 0.17)" in favor of the experimental group.
"significant differences between the two groups in the post-test were found in behavioral and time management (t = 2.245, p < 0.05, d = 0.15), environment management (t = 3.243, p < 0.01, d = 0.22) and self-regulatory deficit (t = -2.557, p < 0.05, d = 0.17) in favor of the experimental group"
Tania Vieites 2024 (2)¶
Tania Vieites, Eleftheria Gonida, Fátima Díaz-Freire, Susana Rodríguez, Antonio Valle. (2024). Effects of a homework implementation method (MITCA) on self-regulation of learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09376-z
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Pre-post paired comparisons within each group in the twelve-week intervention. The article reports that control students' deficits rose significantly while for MITCA students "the reports for the self-regualtory deficits remained at the same level"; no effect size is printed.
"in the post-test measure, the control group reported significantly more shirking their academic obligations, losing notes or materials needed to study, waiting until the last minute to do homework or giving up, to a greater extent than in the pre-test measure. This tendency was not observed among the students who participated in MITCA as the reports for the self-regualtory deficits remained at the same level."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Twelve weeks of MITCA homework prescription produced higher time management than traditional homework in 5th–6th graders — related
- MITCA homework prescription improved environmental management relative to traditional homework in primary students — related
- MITCA did not improve information-seeking and help management skills relative to traditional homework — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mitca-limits-self-regulatory-deficits |
title |
MITCA prevented the growth of self-regulatory deficits seen under traditional homework over twelve weeks |
description |
MITCA prevented the growth of self-regulatory deficits seen under traditional homework over twelve weeks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — tania-vieites-2024, tania-vieites-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.