Scalability of the MLADs across municipalities was limited by differing educational data sources, varied LMS platforms, and differing teacher familiarity with data-driven dashboards¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Varying municipal data sources and LMS systems made a one-size-fits-all dashboard solution difficult, requiring per-municipality customization. → Zeynab (Artemis) Mohseni 2026
Evidence¶
Zeynab (Artemis) Mohseni 2026¶
Zeynab (Artemis) Mohseni, Italo Masiello. (2026). Co-designing, developing, and implementing multiple learning analytics dashboards for data-driven decision-making in education: a design-based research approach. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10577-9
q2 · i? · design · r3
In the implementation phase the authors report that "each municipality had different educational data sources" and varied LMS platforms, requiring customization; teachers' differing familiarity with data-driven dashboards also required targeted support.
"Each municipality had different educational data sources, and the learning management systems (LMS) used by each municipality varied. This made it difficult to create a one-size-fits-all solution for all municipalities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A four-phase DBR process with 25 teachers across three Swedish municipalities produced three tailored EasyVis dashboards over one year — related
- Teachers across the reviewed studies used varied digital learning platforms, including learning management systems, adaptive platforms, and intelligent tutoring systems — related
- Educational ontologies are rarely used in practical e-learning platforms, mainly due to cost, complexity, integration, performance, and scalability problems, which ontology reuse can partially overcome — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.