Claims

mLearning students prefer video-based materials with each video under 5 minutes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A survey of 3000 participants at the Online College of Shanghai Jiaotong University found students prefer video-based mLearning materials and expect each video to be less than 5 minutes. → Wang 2012

Evidence

Wang 2012

Wang, M. & Shen, R. (2012). Message design for mobile learning: Learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01214.x

q2 · i? · review · r2

The article reports, citing Shen et al. (2009), a survey of 3000 participants from the Online College of Shanghai Jiaotong University. Students "prefer video-based mLearning materials" with each video under 5 minutes, and also anticipated learning guides, exam help and technical support services.

"A survey on 3000 participants from the Online College of Shanghai Jiaotong University shows that students prefer video-based mLearning materials, and each video should be less than 5 minutes (Shen, Wang, Gao, Novak & Tang, 2009)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mlearning-students-prefer-short-videos-under-5-minutes
title mLearning students prefer video-based materials with each video under 5 minutes
description mLearning students prefer video-based materials with each video under 5 minutes
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wang-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.