Claims

Mixed methods articles were rare (2.55% of empirical articles) in five educational psychology journals from 2016 to 2022, with most articles quantitative

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 2,237 empirical articles screened in five educational psychology journals 2016–2022, 94.9% were quantitative and only 2.55% (n = 57/2237) used mixed methods. → Matthew T. McCrudden · Macy Bowman · Gala Sofia Campos Oaxaca 2025

Evidence

Matthew T. McCrudden · Macy Bowman · Gala Sofia Campos Oaxaca 2025

Matthew T. McCrudden · Macy Bowman · Gala Sofia Campos Oaxaca. (2025). Reporting of Methodological Rigor in Empirical Mixed Methods Research in Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10090-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Systematic methodological review screening all articles in five journals (BJEP, CEP, JEP, JXE, Learning and Instruction) 2016–2022; 2,237 empirical articles classified by method. The review reports "Most of these articles used primarily quantitative methods (94.9%, n = 2123/2237)" and 57 mixed methods articles (2.55%).

"Most of these articles used primarily quantitative methods (94.9%, n = 2123/2237). A much smaller number of these articles used primarily qualitative methods (2.55%, n = 57/2237) or mixed methods (2.55%, n = 57/2237)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mmr-prevalence-2-55-percent-ed-psych
title Mixed methods articles were rare (2.55% of empirical articles) in five educational psychology journals from 2016 to 2022, with most articles quantitative
description Mixed methods articles were rare (2.55% of empirical articles) in five educational psychology journals from 2016 to 2022, with most articles quantitative
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — matthew-t-mccrudden-macy-bowman-gala-sofia-campos-oaxaca-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.