Claims

Model effectiveness reached 76.30/77.47 on critical thinking and 76.30/76.67 on achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The E1/E2 effectiveness of the learning management model was 76.30/77.47 for critical thinking and 76.30/76.67 for academic achievement. → Chaipichit et al. 2015

Evidence

Chaipichit et al. 2015

Dudduan Chaipichit, Nirat Jantharajit and Sumalee Chookhampaeng. (2015). Development of learning management model based on constructivist theory and reasoning strategies for enhancing the critical thinking of secondary students. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2193

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Phase 3 effectiveness evaluation using the E1/E2 test: Process Effectiveness (E1) from learning behavioral evaluation, participation and quizzes was 76.30%, and Output Effectiveness (E2) was 77.47% from the critical thinking test and 76.67% from the learning achievement test.

"Phase 3 found that the overall effectiveness of the Learning Management Model (E1/ E2) was 76.30/77.47. In addition, the effectiveness as calculated from t he Learning Achievement Test was 76.30/76.67, meaning that the Process Effectiveness (E1) obtained from percentage of average value of the Learning Behavio ral"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.