Claims

The dynamic systems model is used to explain differing views on education's role in developing children's creativity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The article's framework is applied to explain why differing views exist on the role of education in developing children's creativity. → Kupers 2019

Evidence

Kupers 2019

Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2019). Children's creativity: a theoretical framework and systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93-124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707

q1 · i? · review · r?

Theoretical application reported in the article's abstract: the authors state the model "is used to explain differing views" on education's role in developing children's creativity. This is the authors' interpretive use of their framework, not a separately tested result.

"This model is used to explain differing views on the role of education in developing children’s creativity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id model-explains-differing-views-education-role-creativity
title The dynamic systems model is used to explain differing views on education's role in developing children's creativity
description The dynamic systems model is used to explain differing views on education's role in developing children's creativity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kupers-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.