Formative evaluation by staff and students rated the MOLH positively on usability, content, and engagement.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Staff (n=7) and students (n=5) rated the site positively on usability, content, and engagement, with means such as 5.0 for 'Easy to use' among staff. → Garivaldis 2022
Evidence¶
Garivaldis 2022¶
Garivaldis, F. J., Chung, J., Braganza, L., Arulkadacham, L., Sharma, R., Reupert, A., McKenzie, S., Rose, G., Gupta, T., Aziz, Z., Mowbray, T., Ilic, D., & Mundy, M. (2022). Out of sight, but not out of mind: a case study of the collaborative development of a university-wide orientation resource for online students. Education Tech Research Dev, 70, 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10090-3
q2 · i? · design · r2
A formative evaluation survey of 22 Likert-scale items was completed by seven community of practice staff and five online students. Staff rated 'Easy to use' at a mean of 5.0 (SD 0.0) and students at 4.4 (SD 0.5); the authors report participants "rated the MOLH positively with regard to its usability".
"The results in the table above reveal that students and staff rated the MOLH positively with regard to its usability. They largely agreed that the content was relevant, detailed, useful, and well organised. Encouragingly, participants agreed that the MOLH resource would be something they would return to and recommend to peers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students reported positive usability and acceptance of MentorChat — related
- Users rate chatbots easy to use with clear, relevant, largely accurate responses, but the intrusive pop-up design is the largest annoyance — related
- Participants rated SOPHIE 2.0 as engaging, easy to use, and clinically relevant in a self-service format — related
- Participants held generally positive attitudes toward VISIGARP but rated diagram layout clarity low while finding layout easy to adjust — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
molh-formative-evaluation-positive-ratings |
title |
Formative evaluation by staff and students rated the MOLH positively on usability, content, and engagement. |
description |
Formative evaluation by staff and students rated the MOLH positively on usability, content, and engagement. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — garivaldis-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.