Claims

Monitoring support delivered via a scripted conversational agent significantly improves goal attainment compared with reflection-only and control conditions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Participants in the Monitoring Only and Monitoring & Reflection conditions reported significantly higher goal attainment than those in Reflection Only and Control conditions. → Martins van Jaarsveld 2025

Evidence

Martins van Jaarsveld 2025

Martins van Jaarsveld, G., Wong, J., Baars, M., Specht, M., & Paas, F. (2025). Enhancing goal attainment in higher education with a scripted conversational agent: Effects of monitoring and reflection support in digital learning. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105441

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Mixed-design ANOVA on weekly self-reported goal attainment in an RCT with 84 undergraduates randomly assigned to four conditions over five weeks; the main effect of condition was significant with η2p = .287, "indicating a large effect".

"The results showed a significant main effect of condition, F(3, 80) = 10.728, p < .001, η2p = .287, indicating a large effect. Results of pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections showed significant differences in goal attainment across conditions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.