The disgust film induction elevated disgust ratings comparably in young and older adults, with no age differences in reactivity or recovery after baseline¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 A Time × Condition interaction confirmed the disgust clip elevated disgust at T1 relative to baseline while the neutral clip slightly decreased it; no Age or Age × Condition effects emerged at post-baseline time points. → Scheibe 2009
Evidence¶
Scheibe 2009¶
Scheibe, S., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2009). Effects of Regulating Emotions on Cognitive Performance: What Is Costly for Young Adults Is not so Costly for Older Adults. Psychology and Aging, 24(1), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013807
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
5 (Time) × 2 (Age) × 4 (Condition) repeated-measures ANOVA of disgust ratings at baseline and four post-induction assessments. The article reports the printed multivariate effects, including a Time effect with η2 = .75, and states no effects were found for Age, Condition × Age, or Time × Condition × Age; age affected only baseline disgust ratings.
"There were multivariate effects of Time, F (4, 133) = 100.48, p = .001, η2 = .75; Condition, F (3, 136) = 13.94, p = .001, η2 = .24; Time × Condition, F (12, 352.18) = 14.58, p = .001, η2 = .30; and Time × Age, F (4, 133) = 2.69, p = .03, η2 = .08."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Age and Developmental Stage — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- The experience of disgust per se does not affect the trajectory of working memory performance in either young or older adults — related
- Intentionally down-regulating disgust disrupts young adults' working memory performance but not older adults' at the second post-induction measurement — related
- Instructions to maintain feelings of disgust do not disrupt working memory performance in either age group — related
- Reappraisal ability shows linear and quadratic relationships with age, while self-reported emotional reactivity shows no age differences — related
- Working memory performance increases from baseline to the first post-induction trial across all age groups and conditions, consistent with practice effects — related
- Sex instruction should work by countering motives with motives, using fear, disgust, self-respect and desire for the regard of others against sexual carelessness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mood-induction-effective-no-age-reactivity-difference |
title |
The disgust film induction elevated disgust ratings comparably in young and older adults, with no age differences in reactivity or recovery after baseline |
description |
The disgust film induction elevated disgust ratings comparably in young and older adults, with no age differences in reactivity or recovery after baseline |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — scheibe-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.