Claims

Benefits of morphology instruction show little evidence of retention at follow-up, though follow-up data were sparse

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Follow-up estimates were very imprecise, with wide confidence intervals covering both positive and negative effects for reading and spelling. → Danielle Colenbrander 2024

Evidence

Danielle Colenbrander 2024

Danielle Colenbrander, Alexa von Hagen, Saskia Kohnen, Signy Wegener, Katherine Ko, Elisabeth Beyersmann, Ali Behzadnia, Rauno Parrila, Anne Castles. (2024). The Effects of Morphological Instruction on Literacy Outcomes for Children in English-Speaking Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09953-3

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Follow-up RVE analyses based on few studies (reading: 8 effect sizes, 3 studies; spelling: 5 effect sizes, 2 studies). "At follow-up measurement, we found estimated effects to be very imprecise and on average reach SMC/SMD = 0.67 for reading (SE = 0.69; 95% CI = -2.29–3.62)"; spelling was similarly imprecise (0.77, CI = -2.09–3.63).

"At follow-up measurement, we found estimated effects to be very imprecise and on average reach SMC/SMD = 0.67 for reading (SE = 0.69; 95% CI = -2.29–3.62)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id morphology-followup-retention-limited-evidence
title Benefits of morphology instruction show little evidence of retention at follow-up, though follow-up data were sparse
description Benefits of morphology instruction show little evidence of retention at follow-up, though follow-up data were sparse
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — danielle-colenbrander-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.