Claims

Motivation generally increases SPT accuracy, but some goals can motivate inaccuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Perceiver interest in the target positively influenced SPT accuracy in videotaped-interaction studies, though relationship-maintenance goals can sometimes motivate inaccurate perspective taking. → Gehlbach 2004

Evidence

Gehlbach 2004

Gehlbach, Hunter. (2004). A New Perspective on Perspective Taking: A Multidimensional Approach to Conceptualizing an Aptitude. Educational Psychology Review 16 (3). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034021.12899.11

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports a laboratory study using the videotape procedure in which male participants were more motivated to figure out the thoughts and feelings of attractive female targets, and this interest "positively influenced SPT accuracy". No effect size is printed.

"Ickes et al. (1990) found that the perceiver's interest in the target person generally (and specifically in the target's attractiveness) positively influenced SPT accuracy."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id motivation-affects-spt-accuracy-with-exceptions
title Motivation generally increases SPT accuracy, but some goals can motivate inaccuracy
description Motivation generally increases SPT accuracy, but some goals can motivate inaccuracy
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gehlbach-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.