Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 MR correlated more strongly with reading (r = 0.46) than NO did (r = 0.29), a significant difference. → Wu 2017
q3 i3 NO and MR were highly correlated (r = 0.64). → Wu 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Wu 2017¶
Wu, S. S., Chen, L., Battista, C., Watts, A. K. S., Willcutt, E. G., & Menon, V. (2017). Distinct influences of affective and cognitive factors on children's non-verbal and verbal mathematical abilities. Cognition, 166, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.016
q3 · i3 · associational · r3
Pearson correlations (Table 2) in the full sample of 330 children; r = 0.46 for MR-reading versus r = 0.29 for NO-reading, compared with a Fisher Z test.
"although both MR and NO were significantly correlated with reading comprehension, MR was more strongly correlated with reading than (r = 0.46) than NO (r = 0.29), Fisher Z = 2.54, p = 0.011."
Wu 2017 (2)¶
Wu, S. S., Chen, L., Battista, C., Watts, A. K. S., Willcutt, E. G., & Menon, V. (2017). Distinct influences of affective and cognitive factors on children's non-verbal and verbal mathematical abilities. Cognition, 166, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.016
q3 · i3 · associational · r3
Descriptive/correlational analysis of the whole sample (Table 2), showing the two WIAT-II math subtests share substantial variance.
"The two math achievement measures (NO and MR) were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and also significantly positively correlated with all four WM subscales."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reading comprehension significantly predicts verbal Math Reasoning but not non-verbal Numerical Operations — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Math anxiety is not significantly correlated with reading achievement in young children — related
- Math anxiety relates more strongly to Mathematical Reasoning than to Numerical Operations in second and third graders — related
- Verbal achievement, reading and language abilities correlate strongly with mathematics achievement (r = .42 to .67) — related
- Type of mathematics assessed (Numerical Operations vs Mathematical Reasoning) does not significantly influence effect sizes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mr-reading-correlation-stronger-than-no |
title |
Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated |
description |
Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — wu-2017, wu-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.