Claims

Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 MR correlated more strongly with reading (r = 0.46) than NO did (r = 0.29), a significant difference. → Wu 2017 q3 i3 NO and MR were highly correlated (r = 0.64). → Wu 2017 (2)

Evidence

Wu 2017

Wu, S. S., Chen, L., Battista, C., Watts, A. K. S., Willcutt, E. G., & Menon, V. (2017). Distinct influences of affective and cognitive factors on children's non-verbal and verbal mathematical abilities. Cognition, 166, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.016

q3 · i3 · associational · r3

Pearson correlations (Table 2) in the full sample of 330 children; r = 0.46 for MR-reading versus r = 0.29 for NO-reading, compared with a Fisher Z test.

"although both MR and NO were significantly correlated with reading comprehension, MR was more strongly correlated with reading than (r = 0.46) than NO (r = 0.29), Fisher Z = 2.54, p = 0.011."

Wu 2017 (2)

Wu, S. S., Chen, L., Battista, C., Watts, A. K. S., Willcutt, E. G., & Menon, V. (2017). Distinct influences of affective and cognitive factors on children's non-verbal and verbal mathematical abilities. Cognition, 166, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.016

q3 · i3 · associational · r3

Descriptive/correlational analysis of the whole sample (Table 2), showing the two WIAT-II math subtests share substantial variance.

"The two math achievement measures (NO and MR) were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and also significantly positively correlated with all four WM subscales."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mr-reading-correlation-stronger-than-no
title Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated
description Math Reasoning is more strongly correlated with reading comprehension than Numerical Operations is, and the two math measures are highly correlated
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — wu-2017, wu-2017-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.