Claims

Multi-perspective, tutor-created trails were the most popular, and students valued hearing multiple views of the same object

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The multi-perspective trails were generally popular, and the most popular trails were created by or in collaboration with tutors. → Reynolds 2010

Evidence

Reynolds 2010

Reynolds, R., Walker, K., & Speight, C. (2010). Web-based museum trails on PDAs for university-level design students: Design and evaluation. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.010

q2 · i? · design · r3

Summative evaluation of social factors in trail use: "The multi-perspective trails were generally found to be popular", especially the tutor-created thrill trail; students particularly valued listening to different people's views of the same object.

"The multi-perspective trails were generally found to be popular, and the most popular trails were created by (or in collaboration with) tutors; particularly the'thrill trail'with its unconventional nature and very specific instructions"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id multi-perspective-trails-popular
title Multi-perspective, tutor-created trails were the most popular, and students valued hearing multiple views of the same object
description Multi-perspective, tutor-created trails were the most popular, and students valued hearing multiple views of the same object
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — reynolds-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.