Claims

Fourth graders receiving multi-component social studies vocabulary instruction made significantly greater vocabulary gains on a curriculum-based measure than comparison peers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The intervention group's pre-to-posttest 1 gain on the CBM vocabulary measure was significantly larger than the comparison group's. → Graham 2015

Evidence

Graham 2015

Graham, L., Graham, A., & West, C. (2015). From Research to Practice: The Effect of Multi-Component Vocabulary Instruction on Increasing Vocabulary and Comprehension Performance in Social Studies. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 147-160. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078850

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental study with teachers randomly assigned to treatment or comparison across 3 districts and 5 schools; 375 fourth graders in 15 treatment and 14 comparison sections. Difference score analysis on the five-minute vocabulary-matching CBM showed "a significant d ifference between post -test 1 and pre-test for the intervention group" (p < 0.001 in Table 4; mean differences 9.03 vs 3.86).

"Difference score analysis demonstrates a significant d ifference between post -test 1 and pre-test for the intervention group on the CBM measure (Table 4)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.