Claims

The video-group advantage grew to almost 8 points on a retention assessment taken two weeks later

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The study (video) group scored almost 8 points higher than the control (textbook) group on the 20-question retention quiz two weeks after the base sessions, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). → Jose J. Vazquez & Eric P. Chiang 2016

Evidence

Jose J. Vazquez & Eric P. Chiang 2016

Jose J. Vazquez & Eric P. Chiang. (2016). Preparing Students For Class: A Clinical Trial Testing The Efficacy Between Multimedia Pre-lectures And Textbooks in an Economics Course. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 13(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095763

q3 · i? · causal · r2

OLS regression (Model 2, n = 82) on the retention score from a 20-question quiz taken 2 weeks after the initial assessment. The Group coefficient was 7.758 (SE 3.340), significant at p < 0.05; the authors interpret this as an "even greater benefit on concept retention".

"Holding all other variables constant, the study (video) group scored almost 8 points higher in the retention assessment quiz than a student in the control (textbook) group. These statistically significant results suggest that the effect of multimedia videos had an even greater benefit on concept retention."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.